From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tejada v. Target Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 30, 2024
1:23-cv-6450 (MKV) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2024)

Opinion

1:23-cv-6450 (MKV)

01-30-2024

MARIA TEJADA, Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORPORATION et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court is in receipt of a letter from Defendant Target Corporation, writing on behalf of all counsel, informing the Court that all parties reached a settlement in principle with the assistance of the mediator [ECF No. 17]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the application to restore the action is made by March 29, 2024. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tejada v. Target Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 30, 2024
1:23-cv-6450 (MKV) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Tejada v. Target Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MARIA TEJADA, Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORPORATION et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 30, 2024

Citations

1:23-cv-6450 (MKV) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2024)