Tejada v. Robbins

Full title: JOSE ROBERTO TEJADA, Petitioner, v. TIMOTHY S. ROBBINS, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Dec 9, 2011

SA CV 11-1496 JHN (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2011)

Opinion

JOSE ROBERTO TEJADA, Petitioner, v. TIMOTHY S. ROBBINS, Respondent. No. SA CV 11-1496 JHN (JCG) United States District Court, C.D. California. December 9, 2011

          ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.¹

1 The docket indicates that the copies of the Report and Recommendation and the Notice of Filing of Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation that were mailed to Petitioner at his address of record were returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable. [See Docket Nos. 8-9.] Since more than 15 days have passed since the Report and Recommendation was mailed, and since Petitioner has not complied with his obligation to advise the Court of his current address, this action is also subject to dismissal pursuant to Local Rule 41-6.

         Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

         1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted; and

         2. Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action as moot.