From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Teichner v. Berkeley Bowl Produce, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 30, 2023
22-cv-06202-WHO (N.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-06202-WHO

01-30-2023

NAYANI DAVID TEICHNER, Plaintiff, v. BERKELEY BOWL PRODUCE, INC., Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE RE: DKT. NOS. 22, 24

William H. Orrick, United States District Judge

On January 25, 2023, pro se plaintiff Nayani David Teichner filed a “voluntary notice to withdraw the case.” Dkt. No. 22. The next day, defendant Berkeley Bowl Produce, Inc., requested an order “specifying that this entire action has been dismissed, with prejudice.” Dkt. No. 24. On January 30, 2023, the plaintiff filed an amended notice clarifying that his voluntary dismissal was without prejudice. Dkt. No. 25.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the plaintiff may dismiss the action at this juncture by filing a notice of dismissal. Because the initial notice did not state otherwise, under Rule 41(a)(1)(B) “the dismissal is without prejudice.” See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(B). The amended notice confirms this, and the defendant has provided no reason for departing from the Rule. See Dkt. Nos. 24, 25.

In accordance with the plaintiff's filings and Rule 41(a)(1), this matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Teichner v. Berkeley Bowl Produce, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 30, 2023
22-cv-06202-WHO (N.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Teichner v. Berkeley Bowl Produce, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NAYANI DAVID TEICHNER, Plaintiff, v. BERKELEY BOWL PRODUCE, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 30, 2023

Citations

22-cv-06202-WHO (N.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2023)