From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Teeter v. Allstate Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 19, 1961
9 N.Y.2d 655 (N.Y. 1961)

Summary

In Teeter v. Allstate Insurance Co., 9 N.Y.2d 655 (1961), affirming mem., 9 A.D.2d 176 (4th Dept. 1959) the Court of Appeals affirmed the holding of the Appellate Division that the common law right of rescission ab initio for fraud did not survive the adoption of section 313 of the N.Y. Vehicle Traffic Law and, in accordance with that provision, cancellation of an automobile insurance policy may only be done prospectively.

Summary of this case from Norguard Ins. Co. v. Lopez

Opinion

Argued January 3, 1961

Decided January 19, 1961

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, DANIEL J. O'MARA, J.

William L. Shumate and William V. Gough for appellant.

Leonard E. Maas for respondent.

Lubell and Lubell for New York State Association of Plaintiffs' Trial Lawyers, amicus curie. Alfred J. Bohlinger and Alfred Miller for National Association of Independent Insurers, amicus curiae. James B. Donovan and Patrick J. Hughes for Association of Casualty and Surety Companies, amicus curiae.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.


Summaries of

Teeter v. Allstate Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 19, 1961
9 N.Y.2d 655 (N.Y. 1961)

In Teeter v. Allstate Insurance Co., 9 N.Y.2d 655 (1961), affirming mem., 9 A.D.2d 176 (4th Dept. 1959) the Court of Appeals affirmed the holding of the Appellate Division that the common law right of rescission ab initio for fraud did not survive the adoption of section 313 of the N.Y. Vehicle Traffic Law and, in accordance with that provision, cancellation of an automobile insurance policy may only be done prospectively.

Summary of this case from Norguard Ins. Co. v. Lopez
Case details for

Teeter v. Allstate Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND F. TEETER, JR., Respondent, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 19, 1961

Citations

9 N.Y.2d 655 (N.Y. 1961)
212 N.Y.S.2d 71
173 N.E.2d 47

Citing Cases

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Sullam

Both Massachusetts and New York agree on this principle. (See Teeter v. Allstate Ins. Co., 9 A.D.2d 176,…

United Security v. Ins Comm'r

However, we see no reason in law or policy for the burden of such a risk to be placed on the insurer in…