Teemac v. Frito-Lay, Inc.

Full title: HANDY TEEMAC, Plaintiff, v. FRITO-LAY, INC., Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Mar 19, 2014

Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-5241-M (BF) (N.D. Tex. Mar. 19, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-5241-M (BF)

03-19-2014

HANDY TEEMAC, Plaintiff, v. FRITO-LAY, INC., Defendant.

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

ORDER ACCEPTING SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has under consideration the Supplemental Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney. The District Court reviewed the Supplemental Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Supplemental Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [D.E. 16] is denied as moot and this action is dismissed without prejudice.

__________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS