From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tedla v. Ellman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 1937
253 App. Div. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

December 24, 1937.

Present — Hagarty, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.


Consolidated actions. One action was brought by Mary Bachek, as administratrix, to recover damages for the death of her intestate as the result of injuries received when struck by an automobile as he was trundling a baby carriage, filled with wood and junk, on a public highway. The other action was brought by Anna Tedla to recover damages for personal injuries received in the same accident and while she was pushing a baby carriage similarly loaded, and by her husband to recover for medical expenses and loss of services. Judgments in favor of plaintiffs and orders denying motion to set aside the verdicts unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Tedla v. Ellman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 1937
253 App. Div. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Tedla v. Ellman

Case Details

Full title:ANNA TEDLA and JOSEPH TEDLA, Respondents, v. JOSEPH ELLMAN and ISIDORE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 24, 1937

Citations

253 App. Div. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)