Opinion
2011-1303
01-18-2012
TECSEC, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., SAS INSTITUTE, INC., SAP AMERICA, INC., SAP, AG, SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., ORACLE CORPORATION, SYBASE, INC., SOFTWARE AG, SOFTWARE AG, INC., ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., EBAY, INC., and PAYPAL, INC., Defendants.
GREGORY N. STILLMAN, Hunton & Williams LLP, of Norfolk, Virginia, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel on the brief were MICHAEL A. O'SHEA and MICHAEL A. OAKES, of Washington, DC; and ANDREW G. DINOVO and ADAM G. PRICE, DiNovo Price Ellwanger & Hardy LLP, of Austin, Texas. JOHN M. DESMARAIS, Desmarais, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellee. of counsel on the brief were JON T. HOHENTHANER, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of New York, New York; and ELIZABETH BERNARD and WILLIAM H. BURGESS, of Washington, DC.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 10-CV-0115, Judge Leonie M. Brinkema.
JUDGMENT
GREGORY N. STILLMAN, Hunton & Williams LLP, of Norfolk, Virginia, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel on the brief were MICHAEL A. O'SHEA and MICHAEL A. OAKES, of Washington, DC; and ANDREW G. DINOVO and ADAM G. PRICE, DiNovo Price Ellwanger & Hardy LLP, of Austin, Texas.
JOHN M. DESMARAIS, Desmarais, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellee. of counsel on the brief were JON T. HOHENTHANER, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of New York, New York; and ELIZABETH BERNARD and WILLIAM H. BURGESS, of Washington, DC.
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LINN, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
_________________________
Jan Horbaly
Clerk