From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TecnoGlass, S.A. v. Moos Distrib., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 6, 2013
Case No. 13-cv-01031-JCS (N.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 13-cv-01031-JCS

05-06-2013

TECNOGLASS, S.A., a Columbian Corporation, Plaintiff, v. MOOS DISTRIBUTING, INC.; WEBCOR CONSTRUCTION dba WEBCOR BUILDERS; SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION; THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. MOOS DISTRIBUTING, INC., dba SADEV USA, a Iowa corporation, Counter-claimant, v. C.E. TOLAND & SON, a California corporation, WEBCOR CONSTRUCTION, LP dba Webcor Builders, a California limited partnership, TECNOGLASS, S.A., a Colombian Corporation, SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a New Hampshire corporation, THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, a Pennsylvania corporation, Counter-defendants.

CITY AND COUNTY OF FRANCISCO (Specially Appearing) MICHEL S. DEEB Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ABRAMSON & BROWN AARON SCOTT BROWN Attorney For Plaintiff TECNOGLASS, S.A., A COLUMBIAN CORPORATION


DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
RONALD P. FLYNN, State Bar #184186
Team Leader
MICHEL S. DEEB, State Bar #268629
Deputy City Attorneys
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, 4th Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone: (415) 554-3820
Facsimile: (415) 255-0733
ronald.flynn@sfgov.org
michel.deeb@sfgov.org
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [CIVIL LOCAL

RULE 6-1(A)]


Hon. Joseph C. Spero

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND

Pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendant City and County of San Francisco, including its Public Utilities Commission (collectively "San Francisco") and Plaintiff Tecnoglass, S A., a Columbian Corporation ("Tecnoglass") and, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, Tecnoglass served its Complaint stating a cause of action for Enforcement of Stop Notice against San Francisco on April 11, 2013;

WHEREAS, San Francisco currently has until May 2, 2013 to answer or otherwise respond to the Tecnoglass Complaint;

WHEREAS, an additional 22 days for San Francisco's answer or other response to the Tecnoglass Complaint will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order;

WHEREAS, San Francisco is specially appearing by this Stipulation and does not waive any affirmative defenses through this Stipulation;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel, that San Francisco shall have until, on or before May 24, 2013, to answer or otherwise respond to the Tecnoglass Complaint.

CITY AND COUNTY OF FRANCISCO

(Specially Appearing)

By: __________

MICHEL S. DEEB

Attorneys for Defendant

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

ABRAMSON & BROWN

By: __________

AARON SCOTT BROWN

Attorney For Plaintiff

TECNOGLASS, S.A., A COLUMBIAN

CORPORATION


Summaries of

TecnoGlass, S.A. v. Moos Distrib., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 6, 2013
Case No. 13-cv-01031-JCS (N.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)
Case details for

TecnoGlass, S.A. v. Moos Distrib., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TECNOGLASS, S.A., a Columbian Corporation, Plaintiff, v. MOOS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 6, 2013

Citations

Case No. 13-cv-01031-JCS (N.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)