Technology v. Mabus

Full title: MACRO-Z TECHNOLOGY, Appellant v. RAYMOND E. MABUS, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jul 13, 2015

793 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 2015–1025.

2015-07-13

MACRO–Z TECHNOLOGY, Appellant v. Raymond E. MABUS, Secretary of the Navy, Appellee.

Appeal from the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in No. 56711, Administrative Judge Mark A. Melnick, Administrative Judge David W. James, Jr., Administrative Judge Mark N. Stempler. James Francis Nagle, Oles Morrison Rinker & Baker LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for appellant. James Patrick Connor, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by Benjamin C. Mizer, Robert E. Kirschman, Jr., Bryant G. Snee; Robyn L. Hamady, General Litigation Division, United States Department of the Navy, Washington, DC.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in No. 56711, Administrative Judge Mark A. Melnick, Administrative Judge David W. James, Jr., Administrative Judge Mark N. Stempler.
James Francis Nagle, Oles Morrison Rinker & Baker LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for appellant. James Patrick Connor, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by Benjamin C. Mizer, Robert E. Kirschman, Jr., Bryant G. Snee; Robyn L. Hamady, General Litigation Division, United States Department of the Navy, Washington, DC.
PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. SeeFed. Cir. R. 36.