Opinion
Case No. CIV S-03-1329 WBS PAN.
February 14, 2011
Raymond P. Niro, Joseph N. Hosteny, Arthur A. Gasey, Paul C. Gibbons, Kara L. Szpondowski, NIRO, HALLER NIRO, Chicago, IL, Audrey A. Millemann, WEINTRAUB GENSHLEA CHEDIAK LAW CORPORATION, State Bar No. 124954, ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF TECHNOLOGY LICENSING CORPORATION.
Christina C. Marshall (SBN 2093150), DUANE MORRIS LLP, San Francisco, CA, Gary R. Maze (pro hac vice), DUANE MORRIS LLP, Houston, TX, J. Donald McCarthy (SBN 69864), DUANE MORRIS LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Richard T. Redano (pro hac vice), RICHARD T REDANO PC, Houston, TX, Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, Technicolor USA, Inc.
ORDER
Having considered the Joint Notice Of Motion And Motion To Amend Scheduling Order filed by Plaintiff Technology Licensing Corporation and Defendant Technicolor USA, Inc., all papers on file, and all arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that this Motion has merit and that it is therefore GRANTED.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. all currently remaining Scheduling Order deadlines are hereby VACATED; and
2. the following deadlines are now in effect:
DEADLINE DATE November 14, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. January 18, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.
Parties to disclose experts and produce reports June 1, 2011 in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) For expert testimony intended solely for July 1, 2011 rebuttal, experts are to be disclosed and reports produced in accordance with Federal Rule of civil Procedure 26(a)(2) All discovery to be completed August 5, 2011 All pretrial motions filed by September 6, 2011 Final Pretrial Conference Jury trial Dated: February 11, 2011