From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tech. & Intellectual Prop. Strategies Grp. Pc. v. Fthenakis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
Nov 30, 2011
No. C 11-02373 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-02373 MEJ

11-30-2011

TECHNOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY STRATEGIES GROUP PC. Plaintiff, v. BASIL P. FTHENAKIS, Defendant.


ORDER FOR PARTIES TO APPEAR FOR COURTROOM MEET AND CONFER SESSION

The Court is in receipt of Defendant's request for a telephonic discovery conference. In the request, Defendant's counsel state(s) that Plaintiff has failed to comply with discovery obligations. Pursuant to the undersigned's discovery standing order, as to any discovery dispute, the parties must meet and confer in person and, if unable to resolve the dispute, file a joint letter. As it appears that the parties have been unable to comply with the standing order, the Court hereby ORDERS the parties to meet and confer, in person, on December 7, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom B, located on the 15th Floor of the Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102.

At the meet and confer session, the parties shall come prepared to meaningfully discuss and resolve their outstanding discovery dispute(s). In the event that the parties are unable to resolve their disputes, they shall draft a joint letter at the meet and confer session in compliance with paragraph 4 of the standing order, and said letter shall be presented by the parties for filing at the conclusion of the session. Thus, the parties are ORDERED to bring with them one laptop and a USB port-compatible storage medium (such as a thumb drive) to use in drafting said letter. The parties are advised that they will not meet with the undersigned during or after the meet and confer session.

If the parties are able to meet and confer in person and resolve their disputes or file any necessary joint meet and confer letters prior to the meet and confer session, the parties shall jointly request that the Court vacate the date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Maria-Elena James

Chief United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Tech. & Intellectual Prop. Strategies Grp. Pc. v. Fthenakis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
Nov 30, 2011
No. C 11-02373 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Tech. & Intellectual Prop. Strategies Grp. Pc. v. Fthenakis

Case Details

Full title:TECHNOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY STRATEGIES GROUP PC. Plaintiff, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California

Date published: Nov 30, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-02373 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2011)