Petitioner's failure to appear for trial and failure to comply with the terms of the Standing Pretrial Order requiring adequate pretrial preparation have prejudiced respondent by causing him to expend resources that could have been expended elsewhere. See Jarvis v. Commissioner, 735 Fed.Appx. 21 (Mem), 22 (2d Cir. 2018); Tebedo v. Commissioner, 676 Fed.Appx. 750, 752 (10th Cir. 2017); cf. Pickett v. Commissioner, 240 Fed.Appx. 883, 884 (2d Cir. 2007) (finding the Commissioner prejudiced where taxpayers refused to appear for trial, thereby forcing "the agency to waste its resources in pointless litigation, thus diverting its ability to collect taxes elsewhere"). Moreover, petitioner's failure to appear for trial and failure to comply with the Standing Pretrial Order and Order to Show Cause have hindered the Court's management of its docket.
Petitioner's failure to appear for trial and failure to comply with the terms of the Standing Pretrial Order requiring adequate pretrial preparation have prejudiced respondent by causing him to expend resources that could have been expended elsewhere. See Jarvis v. Commissioner, 735 Fed.Appx. 21 (Mem), 22 (2d Cir. 2018); Tebedo v. Commissioner, 676 Fed.Appx. 750, 752 (10th Cir. 2017); cf. Pickett v. Commissioner, 240 Fed.Appx. 883, 884 (2d Cir. 2007) (finding the Commissioner prejudiced where taxpayers refused to appear for trial, thereby forcing "the agency to waste its resources in pointless litigation, thus diverting its ability to collect taxes elsewhere"). Moreover, petitioner's failure to appear for trial and failure to comply with the Standing Pretrial Order have hindered the Court's management of its docket.
Petitioner's failure to appear for trial and failure to comply with the terms of the Standing Pretrial Order requiring adequate pretrial preparation have prejudiced respondent by causing him to expend resources that could have been expended elsewhere. See Jarvis v. Commissioner, 735 Fed.Appx. 21 (Mem), 22 (2d Cir. 2018); Tebedo v. Commissioner, 676 Fed.Appx. 750, 752 (10th Cir. 2017); cf. Pickett v. Commissioner, 240 Fed.Appx. 883, 884 (2d Cir. 2007) (finding the Commissioner prejudiced where taxpayers refused to appear for trial, thereby forcing "the agency to waste its resources in pointless litigation, thus diverting its ability to collect taxes elsewhere"). Moreover, petitioner's failure to appear for trial and failure to comply with the Standing Pretrial Order and Order to Show Cause have hindered the Court's management of its docket.
Petitioner's failure to appear for trial and failure to comply with the terms of the Standing Pretrial Order requiring adequate pretrial preparation have prejudiced respondent by causing him to expend resources that could have been expended elsewhere. See Jarvis v. Commissioner, 735 Fed.Appx. 21 (Mem), 22 (2d Cir. 2018); Tebedo v. Commissioner, 676 Fed.Appx. 750, 752 (10th Cir. 2017); cf. Pickett v. Commissioner, 240 Fed.Appx. 883, 884 (2d Cir. 2007) (finding the Commissioner prejudiced where taxpayers refused to appear for trial, thereby forcing "the agency to waste its resources in pointless litigation, thus diverting its ability to collect taxes elsewhere"). Moreover, petitioner's failure to appear for trial and failure to comply with the Standing Pretrial Order and Order to Show Cause have hindered the Court's management of its docket.
Petitioner's failure to appear for trial and failure to comply with the terms of the Standing Pretrial Order requiring adequate pretrial preparation have prejudiced respondent by causing him to expend resources that could have been expended elsewhere. See Jarvis v. Commissioner, 735 Fed.Appx. 21 (Mem), 22 (2d Cir. 2018); Tebedo v. Commissioner, 676 Fed.Appx. 750, 752 (10th Cir. 2017); cf. Pickett v. Commissioner, 240 Fed.Appx. 883, 884 (2d Cir. 2007) (finding the Commissioner prejudiced where taxpayers refused to appear for trial, thereby forcing "the agency to waste its resources in pointless litigation, thus diverting its ability to collect taxes elsewhere"). Moreover, petitioner's failure to appear for trial and failure to comply with the Standing Pretrial Order and Order to Show Cause have hindered the Court's management of its docket.
Petitioner's failure to appear for trial and failure to comply with the terms of the Standing Pretrial Order requiring adequate pretrial preparation have prejudiced respondent by causing him to expend resources that could have been expended elsewhere. See Jarvis v. Commissioner, 735 Fed.Appx. 21 (Mem), 22 (2d Cir. 2018); Tebedo v. Commissioner, 676 Fed.Appx. 750, 752 (10th Cir. 2017); cf. Pickett v. Commissioner, 240 Fed.Appx. 883, 884 (2d Cir. 2007) (finding the Commissioner prejudiced where taxpayers refused to appear for trial, thereby forcing "the agency to waste its resources in pointless litigation, thus diverting its ability to collect taxes elsewhere"). Moreover, petitioner's failure to appear for trial and failure to comply with the Standing Pretrial Order have hindered the Court's management of its docket.
Petitioner's failure to appear for trial and failure to comply with the terms of the Standing Pretrial Order requiring adequate pretrial preparation have prejudiced respondent by causing him to expend resources that could have been expended elsewhere. See Jarvis v. Commissioner, 735 Fed.Appx. 21 (Mem), 22 (2d Cir. 2018); Tebedo v. Commissioner, 676 Fed.Appx. 750, 752 (10th Cir. 2017); cf. Pickett v. Commissioner, 240 Fed.Appx. 883, 884 (2d Cir. 2007) (finding the Commissioner prejudiced where taxpayers refused to appear for trial, thereby forcing "the agency to waste its resources in pointless litigation, thus diverting its ability to collect taxes elsewhere"). Moreover, petitioner's failure to appear for trial and failure to comply with the Standing Pretrial Order have hindered the Court's management of its docket.
Petitioner's failure to appear for trial and failure to comply with the terms of the Standing Pretrial Notice requiring adequate pretrial preparation have prejudiced respondent by causing him to expend resources that could have been expended elsewhere. See Jarvis v. Commissioner, 735 Fed.Appx. 21 (Mem), 22 (2d Cir. 2018); Tebedo v. Commissioner, 676 Fed.Appx. 750, 752 (10th Cir. 2017); cf. Pickett v. Commissioner, 240 Fed.Appx. 883, 884 (2d Cir. 2007) (finding the Commissioner prejudiced where taxpayers refused to appear for trial, thereby forcing "the agency to waste its resources in pointless litigation, thus diverting its ability to collect taxes elsewhere"). Moreover, petitioner's failure to appear for trial and failure to comply with the Standing Pretrial Notice have hindered the Court's management of its docket.
Petitioner's failure to appear for trial and failure to comply with the terms of the Standing Pretrial Notice requiring adequate pretrial preparation have prejudiced respondent by causing him to expend resources that could have been expended elsewhere. See Jarvis v. Commissioner, 735 Fed.Appx. 21, 22 (2d Cir. 2018); Tebedo v. Commissioner, 676 Fed.Appx. 750, 752 (10th Cir. 2017); Pickett v. Commissioner, 240 Fed.Appx. 883, 884 (2d Cir. 2007) (finding the Commissioner prejudiced where taxpayers refused to appear for trial, thereby forcing "the agency to waste its resources in pointless litigation, thus diverting its ability to collect taxes elsewhere").
Mr. Anderson's failure to comply with the terms of the Standing Pretrial Order requiring pretrial preparation has prejudiced respondent by causing him to expend resources that could have been expended elsewhere. See Jarvis v. Commissioner, 735 Fed.Appx. 21 (Mem), 22 (2d Cir. 2018); Tebedo v. Commissioner, 676 Fed.Appx. 750, 752 (10th Cir. 2017). Moreover, Mr. Anderson's failure to comply with the January 8 OSC and the January 22 OSC, in addition to his failure to provide the Court with a current address and telephone number as required by Rule 21(b)(4), the Standing Pretrial Order, and the Court's March 23, 2021 Order, has hindered the Court's management of its docket.