From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Teasley v. Sehorn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Nov 14, 2011
NO. 3-11-0528 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 14, 2011)

Opinion

NO. 3-11-0528

11-14-2011

RON TEASLEY v. DAVID SEHORN, et al.


JUDGE CAMPBELL

ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 57), to which no Objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Hodge, Jobe, Davis, McGee, Rhodes, Elks, and S. Howard (Docket No. 23) be granted. Plaintiff failed to file a Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Failure to file a timely response indicates there is no opposition to the Motion. Local Rule 7.01(b).

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved.

Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 23) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Hodge, Jobe, Davis, McGee, Rhodes, Elks, and S. Howard are DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

TODD J. CAMPBELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Teasley v. Sehorn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Nov 14, 2011
NO. 3-11-0528 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Teasley v. Sehorn

Case Details

Full title:RON TEASLEY v. DAVID SEHORN, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 14, 2011

Citations

NO. 3-11-0528 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 14, 2011)