TEAL v. KING

Full title: KIMBERLY P. TEAL, Plaintiff, v. KIMBERLY KING, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, S.D. California

Date published: Oct 16, 2007

CASE NO: 06-CV-2379 W (BLM) (S.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO: 06-CV-2379 W (BLM).

October 16, 2007

ORDER (1) GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT KING (DOC. NO. 30), AND (2) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 16) AND MOTION TO STRIKE (DOC. NO. 17) AS MOOT

THOMAS WHELAN, District Judge

On October 15, 2007, Plaintiff Kimberly P. Teal and Defendant Kimberly King filed a joint motion for dismissal with prejudice. (Doc. No. 30.) According to the motion, Plaintiff and Defendant King "have agreed to resolve the case between them by way of settlement." (Id., p. 2:1-2.) Accordingly, good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the parties' motion [Doc. No. 30]. Defendant Kimberly King is dismissed with prejudice from this case.

In light of this Court's ruling, Defendant King's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 16) and Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 17) are DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.