T.D. v. St. Louis Cnty. Circuit Court

Full title: T.D., Respondent, v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, DIV. 13, et al.…

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Dec 20, 2022

656 S.W.3d 44 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. ED 110468

12-20-2022

T.D., Respondent, v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, DIV. 13, et al., Defendants, and Missouri State Highway Patrol Criminal Records Repository, Appellant.

FOR APPELLANT: Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Jason Lewis, Chief Counsel for Governmental Affairs, P.O. Box 861, St. Louis, MO 63188. FOR RESPONDENT: Daniel R. Schramm, 121 Chesterfield Business Parkway, Chesterfield, MO 63005, Luke A. Baumstark, 815 Geyer Ave., St. Louis, MO 63104. FOR DEFENDANTS: Allison F. Gensch, Attorney for St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, 100 S. Central, 2 Floor, Clayton, MO 63105, St. Louis County Police Department, Defendant Acting Pro Se, 7900 Forsyth Blvd., Clayton, MO 63105, St. Louis County Circuit Court, Division 13, Defendant Acting Pro Se, 105 South Central Ave., Clayton, MO 63105.

PER CURIAM.

FOR APPELLANT: Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Jason Lewis, Chief Counsel for Governmental Affairs, P.O. Box 861, St. Louis, MO 63188.

FOR RESPONDENT: Daniel R. Schramm, 121 Chesterfield Business Parkway, Chesterfield, MO 63005, Luke A. Baumstark, 815 Geyer Ave., St. Louis, MO 63104.

FOR DEFENDANTS: Allison F. Gensch, Attorney for St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, 100 S. Central, 2^nd Floor, Clayton, MO 63105, St. Louis County Police Department, Defendant Acting Pro Se, 7900 Forsyth Blvd., Clayton, MO 63105, St. Louis County Circuit Court, Division 13, Defendant Acting Pro Se, 105 South Central Ave., Clayton, MO 63105.

Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Missouri State Highway Patrol Criminal Records Repository ("MSHP")¹ appeals the judgment granting T.D.’s petition requesting expungement of two prior convictions under section 564.011 RSMo 1994 (effective from January 1, 1979 to December 31, 2016) and section 571.030 RSMo 1994 (effective from August 28, 1993 to August 27, 1995). We find no error has occurred.

1 In the underlying case, T.D. filed a petition requesting expungement against several underlying defendants consisting of the St. Louis County Circuit Court, Div. 13, the St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, the St. Louis County Police Department, and MSHP. MSHP is the only underlying defendant who has filed an appeal in this case.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).