From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tays v. Metler

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Aug 17, 2017
No. 35,973 (N.M. Ct. App. Aug. 17, 2017)

Opinion

No. 35,973

08-17-2017

PATRICK D. TAYS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAVID F. METLER III, Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF S. CRAIG TAYS, Deceased, Defendants-Appellees.

Patrick D. Tays Ruidoso, NM Pro se Appellant Sutin, Thayer, & Browne, APC Lynn E. Mostoller Katharine C. Downey Albuquerque, NM for Appellee


This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY
Angie K. Schneider, District Judge Patrick D. Tays
Ruidoso, NM Pro se Appellant Sutin, Thayer, & Browne, APC
Lynn E. Mostoller
Katharine C. Downey
Albuquerque, NM for Appellee

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GARCIA, Judge. {1} Self-represented Plaintiff Patrick D. Tays appeals from the district court's order, entered on September 8, 2016. This Court issued a notice of proposed disposition, proposing to dismiss the appeal for lack of a final order. Defendants S. Craig Tays and David F. Metler III, personal representative to S. Craig Tays, filed a memorandum in support of our proposed summary disposition. In addition to agreeing with this Court's proposed disposition on the question of finality, Defendants ask this Court to dismiss the appeal based on principles of collateral estoppel and to limit further litigation by Plaintiff on the matters at issue in this case. Plaintiff has not filed a memorandum in opposition, and the time within which he was permitted to do so has expired. Because we do not have jurisdiction, we decline to rule on the additional issues Defendants raise. {2} Accordingly and for the reasons stated in our notice of proposed disposition, we dismiss for lack of a final order.

{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ _________

TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

WE CONCUR:

/s/ _________
LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge /s/ _________
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge


Summaries of

Tays v. Metler

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Aug 17, 2017
No. 35,973 (N.M. Ct. App. Aug. 17, 2017)
Case details for

Tays v. Metler

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK D. TAYS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAVID F. METLER III, Personal…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Aug 17, 2017

Citations

No. 35,973 (N.M. Ct. App. Aug. 17, 2017)