From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 16, 2009
No. CIV S-07-336 LKK CHS P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-336 LKK CHS P.

October 16, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas corpus proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In this case, It does not appear that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's request filed on October 13, 2009 for appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 16, 2009
No. CIV S-07-336 LKK CHS P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2009)
Case details for

Taylor v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:JERRY LYNN TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. JAMES A. YATES, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 16, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-07-336 LKK CHS P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2009)