From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Trigeno

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 18, 2022
1:16-cv-01143-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2022)

Opinion

1:16-cv-01143-GHW

03-18-2022

ROY TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. NYPD OFFICER ALYSSA TRIGENO, NYPD SGT. MICHAEL DUNLAVEY, RIKERS C.O. QUAYYUM, and CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendants.


ORDER

GREGORY H. WOODS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

As described during the March 18, 2022 conference, Defendants' request for an extension of time to file its motion for summary judgment is granted. Defendants' motion is due on or before May 1, 2022. Plaintiff's opposition is due on or before July 5, 2022. Defendants' reply, if any, is due within two weeks after the date of service of Plaintiff's opposition.

For the reasons stated on the record, Plaintiff's motion to re-open discovery is denied. In addition, as explained during the conference, Plaintiff's renewed motion for sanctions is also denied.

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order by first class mail to Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Trigeno

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 18, 2022
1:16-cv-01143-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Taylor v. Trigeno

Case Details

Full title:ROY TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. NYPD OFFICER ALYSSA TRIGENO, NYPD SGT. MICHAEL…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 18, 2022

Citations

1:16-cv-01143-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2022)