From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Triduanim Fin. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 15, 2011
Civ. No. S-09-954 KJM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2011)

Opinion

Civ. No. S-09-954 KJM

09-15-2011

TAYLOR, BEAN & WHITAKER MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. TRIDUANIM FINANCIAL, INC. et al, Defendants.


ORDER

Defendant Christopher J. Warren has filed a motion, purportedly notifying the court he is proceeding in pro per, along with a request for case status. Counsel for Mr. Warren has not filed a motion to withdraw as counsel, a prerequisite to Mr. Warren's assuming his own defense. L.R. 182(d). Mr. Warren may wish to communicate with counsel about the status of the case.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Christopher Warren's motion to proceed in pro per (ECF No. 74) is denied without prejudice.

____________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Taylor v. Triduanim Fin. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 15, 2011
Civ. No. S-09-954 KJM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Taylor v. Triduanim Fin. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TAYLOR, BEAN & WHITAKER MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. TRIDUANIM…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 15, 2011

Citations

Civ. No. S-09-954 KJM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2011)