From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Jan 26, 2024
No. 03-23-00311-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 26, 2024)

Opinion

03-23-00311-CV

01-26-2024

Andrew Lee Taylor, Appellant v. Floyd Roy Taylor and Noel L. Stout, as Court-Appointed Receiver, Appellees


FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CV-22-004799, THE HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING

Before Baker, Triana, and Kelly Justices.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Appellant's brief was originally due on August 31, 2023. On September 8, 2023, this Court sent a notice to appellant informing him that his brief was overdue and that a failure to file a satisfactory response by September 18, 2023, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. After this Court subsequently granted a motion requesting an extension of time to file his brief, appellant's brief was due on October 16, 2023. On December 12, 2023, this Court sent a notice to appellant informing him that his brief was overdue and that a failure to file a satisfactory response by December 22, 2023, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution


Summaries of

Taylor v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Jan 26, 2024
No. 03-23-00311-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Taylor v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:Andrew Lee Taylor, Appellant v. Floyd Roy Taylor and Noel L. Stout, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Jan 26, 2024

Citations

No. 03-23-00311-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 26, 2024)