From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 8, 1991
582 So. 2d 152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Summary

stating that an arrest warrant is not an untried indictment, information, or complaint that triggers compliance with the IAD

Summary of this case from State v. Robinson

Opinion

No. 89-2259.

July 10, 1991. Certification Denied August 8, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Martin County; Robert Makemson, Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Affirmed. An arrest warrant is not an "untried indictment, information or complaint" so as to trigger compliance with section 941.45, Florida Statutes (1989), the Interstate Agreement on Detainers statute. U.S. v. Bottoms, 755 F.2d 1349 (9th Cir. 1985). See also Sharp v. State, 522 So.2d 51 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Taylor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 8, 1991
582 So. 2d 152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

stating that an arrest warrant is not an untried indictment, information, or complaint that triggers compliance with the IAD

Summary of this case from State v. Robinson
Case details for

Taylor v. State

Case Details

Full title:VANCE S. TAYLOR, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 8, 1991

Citations

582 So. 2d 152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

State v. Robinson

For instance, in State v. Estes, 131 Or.App. 188, 883 P.2d 1335 (Or.App. 1994), it was determined that any…

Churchwell v. State

Affirmed. See Taylor v. State, 582 So.2d 152 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) ("An arrest warrant is not an `untried…