From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 15, 1966
183 So. 2d 865 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

Opinion

No. 65-541.

March 15, 1966.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Ralph O. Cullen, J.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Phillip A. Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before TILLMAN PEARSON, CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.


This is an appeal from the lower court's summary denial of the defendant's second petition for relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. One, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, which attacks the voluntary nature of his plea of guilty at the time of trial.

An examination of the petition, record, and briefs indicates that no new grounds for relief are set forth that were not considered by this court in its denial of the first petition under Rule One. See Taylor v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 169 So.2d 861.

This case is therefore affirmed on the authority of Washington v. Mayo, Fla. 1955, 77 So.2d 620; Simpson v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 165 So.2d 195.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Taylor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 15, 1966
183 So. 2d 865 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)
Case details for

Taylor v. State

Case Details

Full title:OTICE MOORE TAYLOR, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 15, 1966

Citations

183 So. 2d 865 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

Citing Cases

Blunt v. State

Therefore, as to the new matter pled, appellant's motion is entitled to be considered if such new matter…