From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Dec 14, 2022
No. 1D22-2597 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 14, 2022)

Opinion

1D22-2597

12-14-2022

James Taylor, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

James Taylor, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus-Original Jurisdiction.

James Taylor, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court has ruled on the pleading pending below, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Ward v. State, 770 So.2d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (denying a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the pleading pending below).

Lewis, Kelsey, and Winokur, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Taylor v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Dec 14, 2022
No. 1D22-2597 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Taylor v. State

Case Details

Full title:James Taylor, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Dec 14, 2022

Citations

No. 1D22-2597 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 14, 2022)