Taylor v. State

Full title: Tyrone D. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Apr 14, 2020

597 S.W.3d 822 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 107350

04-14-2020

Tyrone D. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Emily Danker-Feldman, Rosenblum Schwartz & Fry, 120 S. Central Ave., Suite 130, St. Louis, MO 63105, for appellant. Garrick F. Aplin, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, 221 West High Street, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Emily Danker-Feldman, Rosenblum Schwartz & Fry, 120 S. Central Ave., Suite 130, St. Louis, MO 63105, for appellant.

Garrick F. Aplin, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, 221 West High Street, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tyrone D. Taylor appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).