From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct 14, 2014
445 S.W.3d 679 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. ED 100748.

2014-10-14

Eric D. TAYLOR, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, 1222–CC09783, Thomas J. Frawley, Judge. Maleaner Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Todd T. Smith, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, 1222–CC09783, Thomas J. Frawley, Judge.
Maleaner Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Todd T. Smith, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before: KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Eric D. Taylor appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).




Summaries of

Taylor v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct 14, 2014
445 S.W.3d 679 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Taylor v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eric D. TAYLOR, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Date published: Oct 14, 2014

Citations

445 S.W.3d 679 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)