From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov 20, 2012
386 S.W.3d 210 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 97971.

2012-11-20

Anthony TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Joan L. Moriarty, Judge. Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Joan L. Moriarty, Judge.
Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Anthony Taylor (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an evidentiaryhearing. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Taylor v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov 20, 2012
386 S.W.3d 210 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Taylor v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anthony TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Date published: Nov 20, 2012

Citations

386 S.W.3d 210 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Stange

Petitioner filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035, which was denied without an…