From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Nov 24, 1998
986 S.W.2d 922 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 73700

OPINION FILED: November 24, 1998 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied: March 16, 1999

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HON. JOHN J. RILEY, JUDGE.

S. Paige Canfield, David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, III, Kenneth P. Ferguson, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., C.J.; Kent E. Karohl, J., and Robert E. Crist, Sr.J.


ORDER


Movant Craig D. Taylor appeals from the trial court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Taylor v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Nov 24, 1998
986 S.W.2d 922 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Taylor v. State

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG D. TAYLOR, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENTS

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Nov 24, 1998

Citations

986 S.W.2d 922 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)