From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Jun 23, 1998
970 S.W.2d 875 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 73820

Opinion filed: June 23, 1998 CORRECTED OPINION August 25, 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, David C. Mason, Judge.

Rosalynn Koch, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Kurt U. Schaefer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.


ORDER


Movant appeals denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Taylor v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Jun 23, 1998
970 S.W.2d 875 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Taylor v. State

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL TAYLOR, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE

Date published: Jun 23, 1998

Citations

970 S.W.2d 875 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)