From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Salinas

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 17, 2010
No. CIV S-10-1798 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-1798 DAD P.

July 17, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's July 12, 2010 request for appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 3) is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Salinas

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 17, 2010
No. CIV S-10-1798 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2010)
Case details for

Taylor v. Salinas

Case Details

Full title:ERIC V. TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. S. SALINAS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 17, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-1798 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2010)