From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Saal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2004
4 A.D.3d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-06782.

Decided February 17, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated June 27, 2003, which denied their motion, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(1) to vacate their defaults in answering and appearing at an inquest, and to vacate a judgment of the same court dated February 27, 2003, entered upon their respective defaults.

Norman Volk Associates, Pearl River, N.Y. (Anthony J. Benedict and Marshall D. Sweetbaum of counsel), for appellant.

Drake, Sommers, Loeb, Tarshis, Catania Liberth, PLLC, Newburgh, N.Y. (Steven I. Milligram and Stephen J. Gaba of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, DANIEL F. LUCIANO and THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To be relieved of their defaults, the defendants were required to establish both a reasonable excuse for each default and a meritorious defense ( see CPLR 5015[a][1]; Eretz Funding v. Shalosh Assocs., 266 A.D.2d 184, 185). The defendants failed to meet either requirement. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion.

SANTUCCI, J.P., SMITH, LUCIANO and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Saal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2004
4 A.D.3d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Taylor v. Saal

Case Details

Full title:DAWN TAYLOR, Respondent, v. JOEL SAAL, ET AL., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 17, 2004

Citations

4 A.D.3d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
771 N.Y.S.2d 670