From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Rose Furniture Company

U.S. Court of International Trade
Oct 26, 2004
341 F. Supp. 2d 576 (M.D.N.C. 2004)

Opinion

No. 1:04 CV 00450.

October 26, 2004.

Julie H. Fosbinder, Joshua R. Van Kampen, Charlotte, NC, for Plaintiff.

Wade E. Ballard, Edwards Ballard Bishop Sturm Clark Keim, P.A., Spartanburg, SC, for Defendants.


ORDER


For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion filed contemporaneously herewith,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motion [Doc. #7] to dismiss Plaintiff's first cause of action against all Defendants entitled "Discrimination in Violation of Public Policy" is GRANTED; Defendants' motion [Doc. # 7] to dismiss Plaintiff's second cause of action under the FMLA against the individual Defendants is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion [Doc. #11] for a default judgment against Defendant Rose Furniture Company on Plaintiff's claim under the FMLA is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion for attorney's fees and costs is DENIED.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Rose Furniture Company

U.S. Court of International Trade
Oct 26, 2004
341 F. Supp. 2d 576 (M.D.N.C. 2004)
Case details for

Taylor v. Rose Furniture Company

Case Details

Full title:ROSE MARY TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. ROSE FURNITURE COMPANY; WILLIAM V. KESTER…

Court:U.S. Court of International Trade

Date published: Oct 26, 2004

Citations

341 F. Supp. 2d 576 (M.D.N.C. 2004)