From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Phox Bus Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 25, 1940
12 A.2d 674 (N.J. 1940)

Opinion

Argued February 8th, 1940.

Decided April 25th, 1940.

The proofs submitted before the Court of Chancery support its order appointing a receiver for the defendant corporation. Order affirmed.

On appeal from the Court of Chancery.

Mr. Paul J. Duffy, for the respondent.

Mr. Irving Charles Picker ( Mr. John J. Fallon, of counsel), for the appellant.


The bill of complaint filed below alleges insolvency of defendant corporation within the statute, R.S. 14:14-3, and prays for appropriate decree and the appointment of a receiver. The matter having been duly considered an order appointing receiver was entered in the Court of Chancery, from which this appeal is made.

The sole ground of appeal argued is that there was a failure of proof of the jurisdictional facts necessary to the issuance of the order and, hence, the granting thereof constitutes an abuse of discretion in the court below.

We are satisfied that the proofs submitted support the order made and the same is affirmed.

For affirmance — CASE, BODINE, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 9.

For reversal — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, DONGES, HEHER, PORTER, JJ.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Phox Bus Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 25, 1940
12 A.2d 674 (N.J. 1940)
Case details for

Taylor v. Phox Bus Co.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT J. TAYLOR, complainant-respondent, v. PHOX BUS COMPANY, a…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 25, 1940

Citations

12 A.2d 674 (N.J. 1940)
12 A.2d 674

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Phox Bus Co.

The appeal is from an order in Chancery making allowances to the receiver and his counsel. Earlier decisions…

Taylor v. Phox Bus Co.

Defendant company appealed from that decree and we affirmed. Taylor v. Phox BusCo., 127 N.J. Eq. 255; 12 Atl.…