Taylor v. Philadelphia Fraternal Order of Police

Full title: ANTOINETTE A. TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. PHILADELPHIA FRATERNAL ORDER OF…

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 13, 2005

Civil Action No. 04-1956 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 13, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-1956.

January 13, 2005

MEMORANDUM

RONALD BUCKWALTER, District Judge

On December 14, 2004, this court entered an order granting defendant's motion to dismiss, citing a lack of response by pro se plaintiff to the motion.

Upon review of the chambers file, the court found that plaintiff did respond to the motion by sending to the judge's chambers a copy of papers dated November 17, 2004, which will be filed with the clerk's office with this memorandum.

Reviewing the motion to dismiss in light of plaintiff's response, it is still clear that there is no basis for this court's jurisdiction over defendant. What claims, if any, plaintiff has set forth in her complaint might be properly brought in state courts.

An order follows.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 13^th day of January, 2005, this court's order of December 14, 2004 is VACATED. Upon reconsideration of defendant's motion to dismiss and plaintiff's response, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED in its entirety and the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE on this date, for reasons set forth in the foregoing memorandum.

This case is CLOSED.