From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Pfeiffer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 28, 2020
No. 2:19-cv-02227-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2020)

Opinion

No. 2:19-cv-02227-TLN-KJN

07-28-2020

JEFFREY TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On June 09, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 09, 2020, are ADOPTED IN FULL.

2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

3. The Court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. DATED: July 28, 2020

/s/_________

Troy L. Nunley

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Taylor v. Pfeiffer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 28, 2020
No. 2:19-cv-02227-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2020)
Case details for

Taylor v. Pfeiffer

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 28, 2020

Citations

No. 2:19-cv-02227-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2020)