From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Pescatore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 1984
102 A.D.2d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

June 18, 1984


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kartell, J.), dated July 26, 1983, which denied their motion for partial summary judgment against defendants Albert Pescatore and Edward Casulli, doing business as Apec Television, Inc., on the issue of damages, based upon a claim of collateral estoppel, arising out of an inquest against a defaulting codefendant. ¶ Order affirmed, with costs. ¶ An assessment of damages against a defaulting defendant may not be used to collaterally estop a nondefaulting codefendant. The mere fact that the codefendant had notice of the inquest does not constitute a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue of damages ( Gallivan v. Pucello, 38 A.D.2d 876; Schwartz v. Public Administrator of County of Bronx, 24 N.Y.2d 65, 71; B.R. DeWitt, Inc. v. Hall, 19 N.Y.2d 141, 145; Card v. Polito, 55 A.D.2d 123). Rubin, J.P., Boyers, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Pescatore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 1984
102 A.D.2d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Taylor v. Pescatore

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH TAYLOR et al., Appellants, v. ALBERT PESCATORE et al., Doing…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1984

Citations

102 A.D.2d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Doe v. Jasinski

To the extent that prejudice to non-defaulting defendants is an appropriate consideration under CPLR 3215 (d)…