From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Palagummi

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 30, 2021
2:19-CV-2375-JAM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-CV-2375-JAM-DMC-P

08-30-2021

BERNARD GLEN TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. S. PALAGUMMI, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a “motion” asking that Defendant Malakkla be dismissed. See ECF No. 18. Plaintiffs motion is construed as a notice of voluntary dismissal of Defendant Malakkla. Because no answer or motion for summary judgment has been filed, leave of court is not required and Defendant Malakkla is dismissed on Plaintiffs notice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 18 as a pending motion. By separate order, the Court will direct service of the action in Defendants Palagummi and Sonza.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Palagummi

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 30, 2021
2:19-CV-2375-JAM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Taylor v. Palagummi

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD GLEN TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. S. PALAGUMMI, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 30, 2021

Citations

2:19-CV-2375-JAM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2021)