From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 15, 1999
266 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

November 15, 1999

Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Lawrence Heisler of counsel), for appellant.

Mitchell Incantalupo, Long Island City, N.Y. (Lorenzo J. Tasso of counsel), for respondent.

GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), dated May 1, 1998, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

On March 2, 1994, the plaintiff was injured when she allegedly slipped and fell on an ice-and snow-covered stairway while descending into the subway station at 75th Street in Jackson Heights, Queens, during a snow and ice storm. The plaintiff claims that she slipped on old ice from a previous snowstorm.

A party in control of real property may be held liable for a hazardous condition created on its premises because of the accumulation of snow or ice only if it had a reasonably sufficient time from the cessation of the precipitation to remedy the condition ( see, Simmons v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 84 N.Y.2d 972; Mangieri v. Prime Hospitality Corp., 251 A.D.2d 632; Wall v. Village of Mineola, 237 A.D.2d 511). A defendant cannot be held liable for an injury caused by a storm which was in progress at the time of the injury.

Based upon the record, there is simply no proof that ice from a prior storm remained in the particular area where the plaintiff fell at the time of the accident or that old ice caused her fall ( cf., Granato v. Bella Vista Group Assocs., 239 A.D.2d 781). As it would be pure speculation that preexisting ice caused the plaintiff's fall, it was error to deny the defendant's motion.

KRAUSMAN, J.P., McGINITY, FEUERSTEIN, and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Taylor v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 15, 1999
266 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Taylor v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:TEDRA TAYLOR, respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
698 N.Y.S.2d 52

Citing Cases

Trainor v. Dayton Seaside Associates No. 3

During discovery, the injured plaintiff testified that precipitation was falling at the time of her accident.…

Smith v. Christ's First Presbyterian Church of Hempstead

had the burden of establishing, prima facie, that it neither created the snow and ice condition nor had…