From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Monroe Detention Center

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 13, 2011
2:11-cv-0460 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2011)

Opinion


ROBERT A. TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. MONROE DETENTION CENTER, et al., Defendants. No. 2:11-cv-0460 JFM (PC) United States District Court, E.D. California. May 13, 2011

          ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

          JOHN F. MOULDS, Magistrate Judge.

         By order filed March 28, 2011, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign this action to a United States District Judge; and

         IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

         These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Taylor v. Monroe Detention Center

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 13, 2011
2:11-cv-0460 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Taylor v. Monroe Detention Center

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT A. TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. MONROE DETENTION CENTER, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 13, 2011

Citations

2:11-cv-0460 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2011)