From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 29, 2013
2013-3037 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 29, 2013)

Opinion

2013-3037

01-29-2013

SHERYL TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. AT1221120255-W-1.

ON MOTION


ORDER

The Department of the Treasury moves to recaption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board as respondent, and for a 21-day extension of time for the MSPB to file its response brief.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed Taylor's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. The Board's responsive brief is due within 21 days of the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

____________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

Taylor v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 29, 2013
2013-3037 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Taylor v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:SHERYL TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 29, 2013

Citations

2013-3037 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 29, 2013)