From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Lynch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 7, 2022
2:21-cv-2413 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-2413 KJN P

10-07-2022

CODY RICHARD TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. On October 6, 2022, a settlement conference was held, and the case did not settle. Good cause appearing, the stay of this action is lifted, and defendants Lynch, Riley, Fredricks, and Collinsworth are required to file a responsive pleading.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The stay of this action is lifted; and

2. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading within thirty days from the date of this order.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Lynch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 7, 2022
2:21-cv-2413 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Taylor v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:CODY RICHARD TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 7, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-2413 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2022)