From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Krebs

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 6, 2011
90 A.D.3d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-12-6

Temple L. TAYLOR, respondent, v. David R. KREBS, appellant.

Cerussi & Spring, White Plains, N.Y. (Richard D. Bentzen of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth A. LaBarca, New York, N.Y., for respondent.


Cerussi & Spring, White Plains, N.Y. (Richard D. Bentzen of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth A. LaBarca, New York, N.Y., for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered*903 September 30, 2010, which granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability is denied, without prejudice to renewal upon the completion of discovery.

Under the facts of this case, it was premature for the Supreme Court to grant the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability prior to the exchange of any discovery ( see CPLR 3212[f]; Babcock v. Roche, 262 A.D.2d 512, 512–513, 691 N.Y.S.2d 343; McNally v. Fitzgerald, 260 A.D.2d 355, 356, 686 N.Y.S.2d 313; Hentschel v. Robert Campbell Carpet Servs., 256 A.D.2d 500, 500–501, 682 N.Y.S.2d 417; Barletta v. Lewis, 237 A.D.2d 238, 655 N.Y.S.2d 389). Accordingly, the motion should have been denied, without prejudice to renewal upon the completion of discovery.

In light of our determination, we need not reach the defendant's remaining contentions.

RIVERA, J.P., LEVENTHAL, BELEN and ROMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Krebs

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 6, 2011
90 A.D.3d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Taylor v. Krebs

Case Details

Full title:Temple L. TAYLOR, respondent, v. David R. KREBS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 6, 2011

Citations

90 A.D.3d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8930
933 N.Y.S.2d 902

Citing Cases

Williams v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.

Since the CVS defendants failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law…