From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Krebs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8930 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2010-10820.

Decided on December 6, 2011.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered September 30, 2010, which granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability is denied, without prejudice to renewal upon the completion of discovery.

Cerussi Spring, White Plains, N.Y. (Richard D. Bentzen of counsel), for appellant.

Kenneth A. LaBarca, New York, N.Y., for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, ARIEL E. BELEN, SHERI S. ROMAN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

Under the facts of this case, it was premature for the Supreme Court to grant the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability prior to the exchange of any discovery ( see CPLR 3212[f]; Babcock v Roche, 262 AD2d 512, 512-513; McNally v Fitzgerald, 260 AD2d 355, 356; Hentschel v Campbell Carpet Servs., 256 AD2d 500, 500-501; Barletta v Lewis, 237 AD2d 238). Accordingly, the motion should have been denied, without prejudice to renewal upon the completion of discovery.

In light of our determination, we need not reach the defendant's remaining contentions.

RIVERA, J.P., LEVENTHAL, BELEN and ROMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Krebs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8930 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Taylor v. Krebs

Case Details

Full title:TEMPLE L. TAYLOR, respondent, v. DAVID R. KREBS, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 6, 2011

Citations

2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8930 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)