From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Klinge

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 16, 2022
2:21-cv-01128-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01128-TLN-DB

06-16-2022

KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. JILL KLINGE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 15, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed April 15, 2022 (ECF No. 7), are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed with prejudice; and

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Klinge

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 16, 2022
2:21-cv-01128-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Taylor v. Klinge

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. JILL KLINGE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 16, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-01128-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2022)