From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Ingram

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 24, 2021
2:21-cv-1042 DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1042 DB P

06-24-2021

KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. MARSHA INGRAM, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee of $350.00 plus the $52.00 administrative fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity either to submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or to submit the required fees totaling $402.00. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

If leave to file in forma pauperis is granted, plaintiff will still be required to pay the filing fee but will be allowed to pay it in installments. Litigants proceeding in forma pauperis are not required to pay the $52.00 administrative fee.

1. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the required fees in the amount of $402.00; plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Ingram

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 24, 2021
2:21-cv-1042 DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Taylor v. Ingram

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. MARSHA INGRAM, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 24, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-1042 DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2021)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Carbullido

For that reason, the court continued the settlement conference to August 19, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. In addition…