From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Hillis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 19, 2011
File No: 1:10-CV-94 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 19, 2011)

Opinion

File No: 1:10-CV-94

12-19-2011

MARCUS TAYLOR, #361170, Plaintiff, v. TERRILYNN HILLIS, et al., Defendants.


HON. ROBERT HOLMES BELL


ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING

MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On November 28, 2011, Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that Plaintiff's motions for entry of default judgments (Dkt. Nos. 91, 92, 93), Defendants Lacy and Hillis's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 95), and Defendant Heebsh's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 96) be denied. (Dkt. No. 109, R&R.) The R&R was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed, and the deadline for doing so has expired. The Court has reviewed the matter and concludes that the R&R correctly analyzes the issues and makes a sound recommendation. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the November 28, 2011, R&R (Dkt. No. 109) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motions for entry of default judgments (Dkt. Nos. 91, 92, 93) are DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Lacy and Hillis's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 95) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Heebsh's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 96) is DENIED.

_____________

ROBERT HOLMES BELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Taylor v. Hillis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 19, 2011
File No: 1:10-CV-94 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Taylor v. Hillis

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS TAYLOR, #361170, Plaintiff, v. TERRILYNN HILLIS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 19, 2011

Citations

File No: 1:10-CV-94 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 19, 2011)