From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Hart

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 20, 2007
C-1-02-446 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 20, 2007)

Opinion

C-1-02-446.

March 20, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 52) to which neither party has objected.

Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly applied it to the particular facts of this case. Accordingly, in the absence of any objection, this Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted.

The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 52) is hereby ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. This case is RECOMMITTED to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings according to law.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Hart

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 20, 2007
C-1-02-446 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 20, 2007)
Case details for

Taylor v. Hart

Case Details

Full title:GRADUAL TAYLOR, Plaintiff v. CHERYL HART, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Mar 20, 2007

Citations

C-1-02-446 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 20, 2007)

Citing Cases

Oro BRC4, LLC v. Silvertree Apartments

Rather, the Court ORDERS Borror to pay Oro's attorneys' fees associated with the subject Motion for…

Breitenstein v. Deters

The disobedient party bears the burden of showing substantial justification or other circumstances that merit…