From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Haroun

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 22, 2023
1:21-cv-01109-ADA-CDB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2023)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01109-ADA-CDB (PC)

08-22-2023

JOE ALFRED TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. AYUB HAROUN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REFERRING CASE TO POSTSCREENING ADR AND STAYING CASE FOR 90 DAYS

Plaintiff Joe Alfred Taylor is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 21, 2023, Defendants De La Cruz and Haroun filed an answer to Plaintiff's first amended complaint. (Doc. 32.)

The Court refers all civil rights cases filed by pro se inmates to Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) to attempt to resolve such cases more expeditiously and less expensively.

The Court stays this action for ninety days to allow the parties to investigate Plaintiff's claims, meet and confer, and participate in an early settlement conference. The Court presumes that all post-screening civil rights cases assigned to the undersigned will proceed to a settlement conference. However, if, after investigating Plaintiff's claims and meeting and conferring, either party finds that a settlement conference would be a waste of resources, the party may opt out of the early settlement conference.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. This action is STAYED for ninety (90) days to allow the parties an opportunity to settle their dispute before the discovery process begins. No pleadings or motions may be filed in this case during the stay. The parties shall not engage in formal discovery, but they may engage in informal discovery to prepare for the settlement conference.

2. Within 45 days from the date of this Order, the parties SHALL file the attached notice, indicating their agreement to proceed to an early settlement conference or their belief that settlement is not achievable at this time.

3. Within 60 days from the date of this Order, the assigned Deputy Attorney General SHALL contact the undersigned's Courtroom Deputy Clerk at shall@caed.uscourts.gov to schedule the settlement conference, assuming the parties agree to participate in an early settlement conference.

4. If the parties reach a settlement during the stay of this action, they SHALL file a Notice of Settlement as required by Local Rule 160.

5. The Clerk of the Court SHALL serve via email copies of Plaintiff's first amended complaint (Doc. 18), the Court's screening order (Doc. 21), and this Order to Supervising Deputy Attorney General Preeti K. Bajwa, and a copy of this Order to ADR Coordinator Sujean Park.

6. The parties are obligated to keep the Court informed of their current addresses during the stay and the pendency of this action. Changes of address must be reported promptly in a Notice of Change of Address. See L.R. 182(f).

IT IS SO ORDERED

NOTICE REGARDING EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

1. The party or counsel agrees that an early settlement conference would be productive and wishes to engage in an early settlement conference.

Yes _____ No ______

2. Plaintiff (check one):

______would like to participate in the settlement conference in person.

______would like to participate in the settlement conference by telephone or video conference.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Haroun

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 22, 2023
1:21-cv-01109-ADA-CDB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2023)
Case details for

Taylor v. Haroun

Case Details

Full title:JOE ALFRED TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. AYUB HAROUN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 22, 2023

Citations

1:21-cv-01109-ADA-CDB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2023)