From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Davis

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Feb 13, 2024
4:23-CV-01129-LPR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 13, 2024)

Opinion

4:23-CV-01129-LPR

02-13-2024

JUSTIN TAYLOR ADC #662925 PLAINTIFF v. DAVIS, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition (RD) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin. No objections have been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. After a de novo review of the RD, along with careful consideration of the case record, the Court hereby approves and adopts the RD in its entirety as this Court's findings and conclusions in all respects.

Doc. 7.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute this lawsuit. The Clerk is instructed to close this case. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order or the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of February 2024.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Davis

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Feb 13, 2024
4:23-CV-01129-LPR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Taylor v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN TAYLOR ADC #662925 PLAINTIFF v. DAVIS, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Feb 13, 2024

Citations

4:23-CV-01129-LPR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 13, 2024)