Opinion
CV-15-00152-TUC-RM
07-30-2021
Louis Taylor, Plaintiff, v. County of Pima, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
Honorable Rosemary Marquez, United States District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Supplement Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”), in which Plaintiff seeks leave pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(d) to supplement his TAC with allegations concerning events that occurred after Plaintiff moved for leave to file the TAC. (Doc. 246.) Defendants responded, stating that they do not concede that Plaintiff's supplemental allegations satisfy Rule 15(d) but that, in the interests of fairness and judicial economy, they do not oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Leave and instead plan to file a motion to dismiss and/or strike. (Doc. 249.) After Defendants filed their Response, Plaintiff filed his Supplemented TAC. (Doc. 251.)
Other pending motions will be resolved separately.
“On motion and reasonable notice, the court may, on just terms, permit a party to serve a supplemental pleading setting out any transaction, occurrence, or event that happened after the date of the pleading to be supplemented.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(d).
Pursuant to Rule 15(d), and there being no objection, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Supplement Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 246) is granted, nunc pro tunc. Plaintiffs Supplemented TAC (Doc. 251) is considered properly filed.