From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Cooksey

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Aug 7, 2007
Civil No. 06-3041-CL (D. Or. Aug. 7, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-3041-CL.

August 7, 2007


ORDER


On July 3, 2007, Magistrate Judge Clarke filed his Report and Recommendation (docket # 29), recommending denial of Defendant's motion to dismiss or transfer venue (# 4), which was converted into a motion for summary judgment (# 13). The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Although no objections have been timely filed, this court still must review the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983) (absence of objection does not relieve "district court of its obligation . . . to decide for itself whether the Magistrate's report is correct").

I find no error.

Conclusion

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (docket # 29) is adopted. The Motion (# 4) to Dismiss or transfer venue, or for Summary Judgment (# 13), is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Cooksey

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Aug 7, 2007
Civil No. 06-3041-CL (D. Or. Aug. 7, 2007)
Case details for

Taylor v. Cooksey

Case Details

Full title:JAMES H. TAYLOR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SANDRA COOKSEY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Aug 7, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 06-3041-CL (D. Or. Aug. 7, 2007)